Charts of the Week
US industry sectors react to Republican victory in 2024 election
What the chart shows
This chart tracks the performance of S&P 500 sectors during presidential election years, highlighting sector overperformance and underperformance relative to the index. Each year is color-coded by the political party of the elected president—blue for Democrats and red for Republicans—revealing patterns in sector performance based on political outcomes.
Behind the data
When this chart was first published on 30 August 2024, the focus was on the historical tendency of certain sectors to outperform the S&P 500 during presidential election years. It highlighted a clear correlation between sector performance and the political affiliation of the winning president, with Financials typically outperforming during Republican victories and Consumer Discretionary thriving during Democratic wins.
Since then, the 2024 election results have reinforced some of these historical trends while diverging in others. For example, Financials and Communication Services aligned with their historical patterns of outperforming during Republican years. However, Consumer Discretionary and IT, which showed mixed historical performance in similar contexts, delivered strong results in 2024, demonstrating the complexity of sector performance beyond historical norms.
US markets thrive despite recession signal
What the chart shows
This chart tracks the performance of the S&P 500 following a trigger of the Sahm Rule, which occurs when the three-month average unemployment rate rises by 0.5% or more from its prior year low. Historical data shows that such triggers have consistently preceded recessions, with the index typically experiencing turbulence initially but recovering strongly over the subsequent year. The chart visualizes median, interquartile and percentile ranges of S&P 500 performance after Sahm Rule triggers, offering insights into potential market behavior over six-month and one-year horizons.
Behind the data
When this chart was first published on 9 August 2024, the Sahm Rule had recently been triggered, and historical precedent suggested an imminent recession. At the time, the analysis indicated potential short-term downside for the S&P 500, though historical data showed recovery and growth over the longer term.
Since then, this cycle has defied historical patterns. 2024 ends without a recession, and consensus forecasts assign a low probability of one in 2025. Instead, the economy has displayed surprising resilience, with GDP growth remaining strong and the S&P 500 surging to new highs. This deviation from past trends underscores the unique dynamics of this economic cycle, driven by fiscal stimulus, sustained consumer spending and labor market flexibility.
Localized employment trends help US avoid recession in 2024
What the chart shows
This chart tracks the share of US states where the three-month average unemployment rate rose by 0.5 percentage points or more relative to its 12-month low, a measure of localized Sahm Rule triggers. The green line represents an equally weighted share of states, while the blue line reflects a labor force-weighted measure. A horizontal grey line at 31% marks the historical benchmark associated with nationwide recession onset. The chart reveals how state-level Sahm Rule triggers fluctuate significantly during economic cycles, with peaks typically coinciding with major recessions.
Behind the data
When this chart was first published on 5 April 2024, over 50% of states had triggered the Sahm Rule, exceeding the historical recession threshold of 31%. This raised concerns of an impending recession, amplified by concentrated layoffs in sectors like technology, finance and services. At the time, the broadening scope of state-level triggers suggested sector-specific vulnerabilities spilling over into wider economic risks.
Since then, the Sahm Rule was ultimately triggered in only 40% of states, far fewer than during past recessions such as 2008 or 2020. This divergence helps explain why 2024 avoided a nationwide recession. Unlike prior cycles where unemployment pressures were widespread, the 2024 triggers were concentrated in specific states and industries, reflecting localized employment dynamics rather than a broad-based downturn.
Volatile revisions to US payrolls spark shift to alternative data source
What the chart shows
This chart tracks 12-month revisions to US nonfarm payrolls for April-to-March cycles, comparing initial reported figures to revised totals. Each year is represented by a red bar for downward revisions or a green bar for upward revisions, scaled by magnitude. The blue line shows the error relative to total payroll levels, while the dotted orange line indicates the average negative revision mean. The dotted red line represents the 5th percentile Value-at-Risk (VaR), marking extreme downside scenarios for revisions.
Behind the data
When this chart was first published on 23 August 2024, US nonfarm payrolls had been revised downward by 818,000 jobs for the 12 months through March 2024, a significant reduction of 0.5%. This marked the largest downward revision since 2009, exceeding historical averages and even surpassing the 95% confidence VaR estimate of 602,000. Concerns were raised about the reliability of initial payroll figures and the broader implications for the labor market’s perceived strength.
Since then, the volatility of these revisions has further highlighted the challenges of interpreting employment data. Repeated large-scale adjustments, often exceeding hundreds of thousands of jobs, have led some macroeconomists to seek alternative data sources. For example, job opening data from the Indeed Hiring Lab – available through Macrobond – offers a more stable and reliable perspective on labor market trends, closely correlating with payroll data but exhibiting significantly less volatility.
These ongoing revisions underscore the need for caution when relying on nonfarm payrolls for real-time analysis.
China’s housing market shows signs of recovery after government stimulus
What the chart shows
This chart visualizes diffusion indices – the share of cities experiencing month-on-month price changes – for new and existing homes across 70 major cities in China. A reading of 50 indicates no change in prices, while readings above or below reflect price increases or decreases, respectively. The blue line tracks new housing, and the green line tracks existing housing.
Behind the data
When this chart was first published on 2 February 2024, the diffusion index for existing housing had just hit zero for the first time since 2014, signaling widespread price declines. The index for new housing had also reached a historic low of 10, reflecting significant stress in China’s property market.
Since then, the index for second-hand housing has hovered near zero, while the new housing index declined even further below 10. However, recent months have shown signs of a turnaround. Both diffusion indices have risen, likely spurred by the People's Bank of China’s (PBoC) easing of monetary policies, including a 30-basis point cut to the 1-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) policy rate and a 50 basis-point reduction in the interest rate on outstanding housing loans in September.
Additionally, the lifting of home purchase restrictions – first imposed in 2016 during a housing price boom – has provided further support.
Despite these encouraging signals, average housing prices in China's major cities remain at historically low levels. But the market seems poised for recovery, especially if further government stimulus measures are enacted.
Chart packs
Remembering bearish Septembers in the stock market
August was disappointing for US equities, with the S&P 500 posting a decline of almost 2 percent. Investors hoping for a rebound are facing the benchmark’s historically worst month.
As our chart shows, in 55 percent of the calendar years since 1928, the S&P 500 fell in September. (Macrobond users can click through here to a second chart showing another bearish stat: the average return for September is less than 1 percent, by far the worst monthly performance by this metric as well.*)
Should investors survive October (a month famed for some historic market crashes) and November, they can look forward to December: the historically most bullish month, when positive returns occurred almost 70 percent of the time.
M3 money supply is shrinking the most in 14 years (but with important differences from the GFC episode)
Last week, we examined the M2 measure of money supply globally; this week, we turn to Europe to look at recently released figures for M3, which is monitored closely by the European Central Bank. (M2 includes M1’s cash, chequing and savings account deposits, and other short-term saving vehicles; M3 adds repurchase agreements, money-market funds and debt securities with a maturity of up to two years.)
As the ECB considers the effects of its tightening cycle, it’s looking at a shrinkage in the money supply. For only the second time in the central bank’s history, the M3 aggregate is decreasing on a year-on-year basis. This last happened during the global financial crisis.
This chart shows another interesting trend that is much different than 2009. This time, rates are rising, so the private sector has been moving money at a record pace out of overnight deposits (a component of M1, in purple – and now in negative territory) into higher-yielding deposit accounts (a component of M2, in surging green). During the GFC, the reverse was true; rates were rock-bottom and investors were switching to cash.
Chinese homebuilding’s outsized role in the construction downturn
Last week, we examined how Chinese construction starts had deteriorated to the slowest pace since 2010. This chart breaks down construction investment by sector on a year-on-year, rolling year-to-date percentage basis, measuring trends in homebuilding, office development and the rest.
As our visualisation shows, residential construction has been the overwhelming driver over the past decade. After a plunge and rebound in the early days of the pandemic, total construction investment began shrinking on a year-on-year basis again in 2022. The market downturn is also reflected in the crises seen at developers Evergrande and Country Garden.
The second panel shows planned construction investments. This indicator had previously always increased on a year-on-year basis – but has been declining for three months.
The Atlanta Fed nowcast has been a bit too bullish lately
This chart looks at the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow forecasts, comparing their evolution over the past four quarters to the ultimate data prints. (The methodology for these real-time “nowcasts” can be accessed here.)
For each quarter, we chart the evolution of the forecasts for annualised quarter-on-quarter economic growth. The forecasts’ range within each quarter is shaded.
As we can see, the final nowcasts for Q2 2023 and, especially, Q4 2022 were well above the ultimate GDP growth print.
The forecast for Q3 2023 is quite bullish, at 5.9 percent growth. Will there be a similar miss this time? One ominous sign is the latest data revision from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis: it reduced second-quarter GDP figures downward to an annualised quarter-on-quarter pace of 2.1 percent.
The US employment scenario gets jolted
On Tuesday, the Bureau for Labor Statistics published weaker-than-expected July figures for JOLTS – the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Has the Fed’s tightening cycle finally punctured the resilient employment market?
The top pane of our chart shows how the ratio of job openings to unemployed persons is declining. And as the second pane shows, job openings decreased for the third month in a row and are now down 26 percent from the most recent peak (March 2022).
But is the labour market truly deteriorating, or just “normalising” as Jerome Powell seeks a soft landing? That 1.5 ratio of job openings to each unemployed person remains historically high. And the drawdown is much more gentle than it was in 2007-09 or 2020 – “hard landing” periods we highlight in grey.
Using futures to anticipate Fed rate cuts in 2024-25
We’ve visualised the changing expectations for US interest rates several times over the past year and a half. As the economy stayed strong during a historic hiking cycle, expectations for a Federal Reserve “pivot” were repeatedly pushed further into the future.
This chart uses futures contracts to calculate an implied US effective Fed Funds rate for the next 18 months. This visualisation also shows the number of implied hikes and cuts on the right-hand axis (assuming that each policy hike or cut will be uniform at 0.25 percentage points).
A true “pivot” isn’t predicted until late spring at the earliest. And the Fed’s benchmark rate is still seen above 4 percent as 2025 begins – far higher than many observers would have thought possible a year ago.
Core inflation is worse than non-core in most of the EU
This chart visualises factors affecting the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices in different European Union countries. HICP, with its standardised methodology across the EU, is the preferred inflation measure of the European Central Bank. (It principally differs from the US consumer price index by excluding owner-occupied housing.)
What stands out in this chart is that the orange dots show how core inflation (which excludes energy, food, alcohol and tobacco prices) is outpacing overall inflation in many EU nations. That’s a worry for ECB policy makers, as it potentially points to a wage-price spiral taking hold in many sectors of the economy.
This is reflected in the purple “other components” category in the individual nations’ bar charts. It’s the largest contributor to inflation for most of them, though food remains a significant factor pushing HICP higher. Meanwhile, the green section of the bars, which includes the energy prices that spiked last year, shows outright deflation in some countries.
The difference between nations is also quite stark. Hungary, with its weak currency, has long had Europe’s worst inflation problem. While President Orban has blamed sanctions on Russia for driving up gas prices, the energy component of Hungary’s inflation is now relatively minor, as it is for most of the rest of the EU.
German business confidence stuck at a red light
This morning, Germany’s Ifo Institute released August figures for its widely watched business survey – and it confirmed the nation’s economic contraction. The business climate index slid to a three-year low of -20.9.
The top pane of the chart uses Ifo’s “traffic light” configuration to compare the three-month change in reading to this measure’s historic range, which has been split into three slices: green, yellow, and red. This summer’s data points have been not just well into “red light” pessimism (the bottom 33 percent of all readings) but at the very bottom of the distribution.
The bottom pane tracks the value change versus 3 months ago – including today’s reading: a decrease of 12.9 in August.
Why the euro-dollar FX rate moves
What drives the most important currency pair? There are various factors, but conventional wisdom says rate differentials are key: when the ECB was tightening in 2008 and the US was fighting the subprime crisis, for instance, the euro soared as capital chased higher yields.
This visualisation is the result of a rolling regression model we built, attempting to find correlations that explain why EUR/USD moved at a given point in time. We tracked two swap spreads. One is a proxy for the perceived future of rate differentials; the other is for which currency is losing more value to inflation. We added Brent crude – ECB research found that pricier oil is correlated with USD weakness – and we added a MSCI spread tracking whether US or European equities outperformed.
According to this model, inflation is having little influence at the moment. But future rate differentials have a substantial negative influence: if the spread moves in Europe’s favour, the euro strengthens.
Meanwhile, spreads between equity markets have the opposite effect: if US stocks underperform their European counterparts, that tends to strengthen the dollar. This could be related to the “dollar smile” theory: consider a “risk-off” market, where a selloff in US tech stocks coincides with a global flight to safety in the form of US Treasuries and USD.
The second panel shows each factor’s contributions to weekly returns – and also indicates the generally lower volatility in 2023 versus the 2022 “King Dollar” era.
Turkish rate shocks and diminishing returns for the currency
Turkey’s central bank shocked markets on Thursday, raising rates to the highest in more than two decades. (We had recently written about President Erdogan’s new economic team, considering the prospects that the nation would return to a more economically orthodox approach to interest rates and inflation.)
The key policy rate was lifted from 17.5 percent to 25 percent – surpassing the 20 percent consensus forecast. The lira soared.
Will the currency sustain these gains? The lessons of history suggest that previous tightening episodes resulted in diminishing returns.
This chart’s first pane tracks the key policy rate. The second panel tracks TRY vs USD. The shaded areas are the periods that followed rate increases of 2 percentage points or more. (The current period groups together several such increases.)
About two years of lira strength followed the big rate hike in 2006, relatively early in Erdogan’s tenure. Later interventions had an increasingly shorter-lived effect on the currency.
Buy-and-hold didn’t work out in Japan
This chart revisits a previous theme: how long would you have had to hold a given equity index to ensure a decent chance of a positive return?
Crunching data going back to 1986, we analysed the US, Japan, Australia and various European nations’ stock benchmarks.
On a two-year horizon, you would have been best off Stateside. The chances of a positive return were about 85 percent. The first 100 percent guarantee of positive returns comes at the 12-year mark – for Australia.
Japan, due to its 1986-1991 asset bubble, is a remarkable outlier. Only the shortest time horizons had a better-than-even chance of a positive return.
Keeping an eye on global M2 money supply
Many strategists have a favourite inflation indicator. One of them is the M2 measure of money supply, which includes cash, chequing and savings account deposits, and other short-term saving vehicles.
This chart measures the aggregate 12-month change in M2, measured in USD, across the largest central banks. Money supply grew at a record pace during the pandemic, exceeding the growth seen during the various quantitative-easing programs of 2008-15. This was followed by a record decline in 2022 as central banks tightened policy to tame inflation. (Only China posted positive money-supply growth over the entire time frame of the chart.)
(One prominent Macrobond aficionado says M2 could have helped predict the 2021-22 inflationary episode, and might tell us what is coming next.)
Sluggish construction in China
As China’s real-estate market stutters, the effects can be seen on new construction. This chart tracks construction starts (measured by floor space) across calendar years, showing the median and high-low ranges since 2010.
This year’s trajectory is currently 26 percent below the historic lows of that range.
Most BRICS are in a spiral
The BRICS nations are in the news again. At the group’s summit in South Africa, the five-nation bloc – originally just a strategist’s concept two decades ago, grouping the biggest fast-growth emerging economies – said it would invite six new countries to join, including Iran and Saudi Arabia, as it seeks to champion the “Global South.”
This visualisation uses IMF data to plot each nation’s progress over about 20 years. The X axis measures GDP per capita, relative to the US, in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms. The Y axis tracks growth rates in real terms, i.e. adjusted for inflation.
Measured this way, the five nations have been on very different paths – though all of them show a slowdown in real GDP growth terms over the decades.
Only China has made significant and consistent progress converging with US affluence. South Africa, Brazil and Russia’s spirals reflect deterioration versus the US.
Americans are hitting Vegas like it’s 2007 again
The gambling industry in Nevada continues to boom, even as the economy slows, inflation persists and Americans deplete their savings. Like demand for international travel, Las Vegas is benefiting from an extended period of deferred gratification post-pandemic.
This visualisation measures “gaming win revenue,” the income that casinos make directly from their roulette tables, slot machines and card games.
The first pane shows that this revenue source, measured as a rolling 12-month aggregate, shot through the long-term trend line in 2021. Perhaps ominously, the last time this occurred was the run-up to the financial crisis.
The second pane shows that monthly win revenue surged to a then-record of about USD 1.3 billion in 2021, and has stayed steady around that level ever since.
Major economies dominated (or not) by their capital cities
How different are capital cities from the nations they govern? This visualisation aims to track geographic economic dispersion in several major economies.
Major urban centres are placed on the Y axis according to their GDP per capita (which is also reflected in the bubble size). The larger an urban area is, the further right it is on the X axis.
Paris and London stand out as by far the largest cities in their countries. The French capital also dominates the rest when it comes to GDP. But Britons may be surprised to learn that there are a few cities with higher economic activity per capita than London. (Fast-growing Milton Keynes, home to head offices and manufacturing plants, tops the ranks.)
Germany is notable for the relative economic weakness of its capital. Though Berlin's tech scene and real estate have boomed in the two decades since its former mayor called the city "poor but sexy," its per capita GDP remains well under the national mean.
The US is a truly decentralised economy when compared to the Europeans: it has by far the biggest dispersion in both incomes and city size. Metropolitan Washington, DC, home to defense companies and well-paid government workers, is well above the national mean – but several areas are considerably richer when measured by the per-capita-GDP metric.
Americans’ pandemic-era savings dwindle
US households built a substantial stock of excess savings during the pandemic. Inflation and higher interest rates are rapidly depleting that stockpile.
This chart tracks savings trends pre- and post-pandemic, with the top pane breaking down different contributory factors. The government’s massive fiscal support, in orange, was key, more than offsetting falling income (in dark blue). “Outlays and personal consumption expenditure,” in green, is another important but somewhat idiosyncratic category: in normal times, it’s a drag on savings, but it entered positive territory in 2020 as people slashed their spending.
As the second pane shows, at the 2021 peak, excess savings represented more than USD 2.3 trillion. The savings stockpile is down more than 60 percent since then.
Today, while incomes are rising, PCE is a significant drag – and Americans are making up the difference by running down their savings.
US credit-card arrears hit pre-pandemic levels
While running down their savings, more Americans are also running up unsustainable credit-card debt – especially with cards issued by aggressive regional banks.
This chart tracks delinquency rates on consumer credit cards, making a distinction between cards issued by the 100 largest US banks (in green) and the rest (in blue).
The global financial crisis appears to have changed big banks’ risk tolerance in this segment. Post-2010, the top 100 maintained a historically low delinquency rate – below 3 percent.
For the small banks, delinquencies hit a record high, surpassing 7.2 percent in the first quarter.
The much lower delinquency levels seen during the worst of the pandemic were likely the result of that excess savings cushion from our previous chart.
Intra-year S&P 500 volatility through history
The chart above displays the S&P 500’s calendar-year returns, alongside the low point – or maximum intra-year decline – for each of those years.
Except for 2008 and 2022, stocks had a tendency to rebound from the point of maximum pessimism. Returns were positive in 12 out of 15 years.
Gloomy leading indicators in Europe
On August 16, Eurostat released updated figures for GDP in the eurozone. The positive news: the region avoided a technical recession in the first quarter, thanks to growth of 0.01 percent quarter-on-quarter. Second-quarter growth was 0.25 percent.
However, data points with a track record of being leading indicators are looking more negative for the eurozone – particularly S&P Global’s composite purchasing managers index (measuring sentiment at manufacturing and services companies) and the Economic Sentiment Indicator (ESI), published by an arm of the European Commission.
This visualisation charts quarter-on-quarter real GDP growth rates against the normalised trends for composite PMI and ESI. The past correlation is bearish for economic growth.
A positive-purchasing-power era for British workers?
This visualisation tracks the UK labour market since 2016 in “3D” – enabling us to not only see when workers were beating inflation or not, but when the job market was in a low- or high-vacancy era.
The X axis assesses year-on-year percentage change in average weekly earnings, while the Y axis measures inflation*. The diagonal line, therefore, divides months that saw workers make real wage gains from periods when any gains were more than offset by the cost of living.
Finally, the bubbles are colour-coded by year – and their size reflects the level of unfilled job vacancies.
The extraordinary effects of the pandemic are clearly visible, as is the 2016-19 “old normal” cluster. The tiniest dots in the lower left reflect the worst moments of lockdown in 2020: very few job vacancies and wages in absolute decline – meaning real wages were falling even though inflation was very low.
The fat dots of the labour shortage era of 2021, 2022 and 2023 also stand out. While in 2022, workers were being pummeled by inflation, we moved into real wage growth this year.
Chinese exports decline almost everywhere but Russia
This table tracks the year-on-year change for Chinese exports to various economies and regions. Demand is faltering around the world, except for the Russian market. Amid Western sanctions on Russia, the two economies have stepped up their trade.
The world’s “early hiker” central banks mostly dodged a recession
When inflation alarm bells started sounding in 2021, some countries – mostly emerging markets – acted more quickly than others. Some hiked rates a year earlier than their developed-market peers did.
This heatmap examines nine of these countries, gauging how they have fared since becoming “early hikers” and whether they have avoided recession.
We chose several criteria: 1) whether the average quarter-on-quarter annualised GDP growth for the past two quarters is below zero; 2) whether unemployment grew by more than 0.15 percentage points over three months; 3) whether the three-month moving average of manufacturing PMI is below 45; and 4) whether average quarter-on-quarter annualised industrial-production growth is below zero for the past two quarters. Wherever these criteria are met, the values have a red background shading.
Most of these economies appear to have been robust enough to absorb the tightening by inflation-hawk central bankers. Only Hungary faces a likely recession.
Repeated nonfarm payroll revisions show a weakening trend
US employment numbers for July showed nonfarm payrolls grew by 187,000. That was slightly less than market expectations, but still in line with a soft-landing scenario. (Two of our users generated forecasts in line with this data release: read about how they did it here and here.)
However, equally newsworthy were the revisions to the May and June NFP figures: they were both reduced. Indeed, NFP is revised at least twice by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, so expect the July number to change as well (and for June to be revised again).
In this chart, we track two years of revisions, calculating the difference between initial numbers released and the latest estimate. So far, every payroll number published in 2023 has been revised downwards. The cumulative revisions since the beginning of the year represent a loss of 245,000 jobs.
Signs of a producer price inflation rebound in China
This chart tracks raw materials purchase prices for the manufacturers’ Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) for China. It also shows the historic correlation with producer price inflation (PPI)– which measures the average change in price of goods and services sold by producers and manufacturers in the wholesale market. (PPI is often a leading indicator for consumer price inflation.)
As PMI prices leave negative territory and climb toward the neutral line of 50, PPI’s year-on-year deceleration is also easing. Given China’s role in the global economy, inflation hawks will be watching.
Foreign direct investment in China declines
China also published its second-quarter balance-of-payments figures this month.
Direct investment liabilities, a proxy for inward foreign direct investment, fell to USD 4.9 billion, a historic low.
The S&P 500’s probability curve for positive returns
This chart crunches historical data to examine the chances of making money from the S&P 500, depending on how many years you’ve been invested.
There’s a steep curve at the beginning. If you’ve been invested for a week, your chance of a positive return is 56 percent. If you’ve been invested for a year, it’s 68 percent. And over two years, your probability of making money rises to 78 percent.
Allocating assets with vigilance (and momentum)
Vigilant Asset Allocation (VAA) is an aggressive strategy designed to take advantage of changing trends. It’s a “momentum” play: you invest in asset classes that have recently performed well, based on the long-observed tendency for such assets to keep rising. (Academics attribute this phenomenon to human behavioural biases, such as herding.)
For the purposes of this chart, we created a VAA strategy that calculates a momentum score for seven different “offensive” and “defensive” ETFs.* It then allocates the entire portfolio to the winner every month.
We then compared VAA to returns for a traditional 60-percent-stocks, 40-percent-bonds allocation. Since 2005, VAA has generally outperformed overall, as the top pane shows. The second pane tracks drawdowns, i.e. the decline from the last record high. VAA generally also posted smaller drawdowns, especially during the global financial crisis, suggesting that higher returns came with lower risk.
Interestingly, this is not the case since 2021; VAA has underperformed.
Tracking inflation’s breadth in the eurozone
This chart visualises the breadth of price increases in the 20-nation eurozone over the past four years.
It does this by looking at annualised quarter-on-quarter inflation rates and then “bucketing” every nation into one of four segments: less than 2 percent in green, 2 to 4 percent in amber, 4 to 8 percent in red, and greater than 8 percent in dark red.
The difference between the pre-pandemic era and the inflationary episode that began in 2021 is stark. Up until April of 2021, the norm was that 70 percent of the nations in the eurozone were probably experiencing very little inflation.
By the spring of 2022, all of the nations in the currency bloc were in the two most inflationary buckets.
While 2023 has seen a broadly disinflationary trend as tighter monetary policy takes hold, inflation hawks will note the renewed spike that occurred in April and May.
Global PMI: comparing manufacturers in different regions
The Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) is one of the world’s key economic indicators. Manufacturing executives are polled to get a sense of whether economic activity is contracting or expanding.
This chart looks at the contributions of the world’s various regions to global-level manufacturing sentiment, aiming to assess the more optimistic and pessimistic geographies.
It assesses PMI from 34 major countries and re-centres them at zero. Next, these time series are weighted by their country’s share of value added in global manufacturing. Finally, they are aggregated into their respective regional territories.
For the most part, Asia-Pacific, the EMEA region and North America have seen PMI sentiment move in unison – from a post-pandemic resurgence through late 2020 and 2021 to a shift to negativity in mid-2022. EMEA has been notably negative in recent months, while Asian manufacturers have reported intermittent flickers of optimism.
Satellites are watching the sluggish activity at Amazon’s logistics centres
Amazon reported better-than-expected earnings this week, with CNBC calling the figures a “blowout.” The e-commerce and cloud computing giant returned to double-digit sales growth, while indicating its core online retail division is recovering.
For most of 2023, the Amazon story had been one of cost cutting and warehouse closures after consumers’ pandemic spending boom faltered.
This chart aims to get a sense of real-time activity at Amazon’s US logistics centres using data from SpaceKnow, which uses algorithms to analyse satellite images. The series used here, CFI-S, is a daily aggregation of the area in square meters that changes between two consecutive satellite images – i.e. vehicle movements.
Activity has been dwindling over the course of 2023 – remaining steadily below the average annual trajectory since 2017.
British firms are filing for bankruptcy
A growing number of companies are filing for bankruptcy in the UK. In the second quarter of 2023 alone, 6,342 companies were declared bankrupt – the highest level since the global financial crisis.
What’s going on? The unsettled, inflationary, post-Brexit economy can’t be helping. But this is also likely a delayed impact from the pandemic, worsened by ever-increasing interest rates. To preserve employment, government subsidies and loans kept many businesses afloat through 2020-21 (as this chart shows).
The burden of repaying these loans has resulted in “zombie” companies, and operators and creditors appear to be pulling the plug.
As our chart shows, the largest contribution (shown in green) is Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidations, a process that is typically applied when debt-burdened, insolvent companies liquidate their business – but involve their creditors in the process to reduce losses. (There are currently relatively few administrations, which occur when there’s the perceived chance of saving a business, or compulsory liquidations, when creditors ask the courts to step in.)
Yield curve control loosens in Japan
The Bank of Japan is the last major central bank to maintain ultra-loose monetary policy. Markets have been watching for signs that a true tightening cycle will begin, given that inflation is running hot.
As our chart shows, the yield curve control (YCC) range – the shaded grey area – was widened at the start of this year, which we wrote about in January. The YCC allows the BOJ to control the shape of the government bond market’s yield curve, keeping short- and medium-term rates close to its 0 percent target.
Recently, the BOJ unexpectedly adjusted YCC again. The 0.5 percent “cap” on 10-year JGBs was watered down; yields will be allowed to move closer to 1 percent.
As our chart shows, the 10-year yield has jumped outside the band. But for now, the BOJ is downplaying the prospects for an “exit” from monetary easing.
India’s stock market is running hot
India’s equity market has rallied to all-time highs, attracting attention from global investors.
This chart uses data from FactSet aggregated by Macrobond to dive into fundamental valuations, comparing Indian equity sectors’ price-earnings ratios with post-2007 norms (as represented by the 5-95, 10-90 and 25-75 percentile bands). The broad market is also included.
As the green dots indicate, 6 of the 10 sub-sectors are trading at PE multiples above the 75th percentile – indicating a richly valued market. The healthcare and non-cyclical consumer sectors have shot above their 95th percentile.
The telecom sector is an interesting laggard on a relative basis, trading near its historic average. This segment also has by far the most volatile historic range.
Visualising US voters’ unhappiness
This chart uses polling data from RealClearPolitics to visualise the proportion of Americans who thought their country was on the “wrong track” at any given moment.
We have tracked this metric over the course of the four-year presidential terms since 2009.
Strikingly, Joe Biden has faced much more voter dissatisfaction in the second and third years of his term than Donald Trump did in his, as the chart shows. Unemployment was low in both 2018 and 2022, but the current president has faced a much higher inflation rate.
The “wrong track” numbers shot up in Trump’s last year, 2020 – touching 70 percent at the start of the pandemic and also at the very end of his term, when the incumbent disputed his election defeat.
Interestingly, voters appear to be so polarised that the “wrong track” number only briefly dipped below 50 percent for a short time – under Obama.
For stock investing, your local currency has rarely mattered more
When investing in equities outside your home market, you’re also trying your hand at a bit of currency speculation, at least in the short to medium term. This has been even more the case over the past 12 months. First, the “King Dollar” period saw the greenback crush almost all competition; this was followed by a retreat.
This chart examines the returns for a hypothetical US investor’s non-American stocks this year. Performance is split into stocks’ return in local currency (in blue) and the currency effect (in green). These net out to a total return represented by the purple dots.
Japan has had a hot equity market this year – but the weak JPY is working against you if you’re measuring your performance in USD. By contrast, US-based investors’ European stock returns have been boosted by EUR strength – and this is even more the case for investors with exposure to Latin American equities and currencies.
Visualising volatile commodities and their moves in tandem
Commodity volatility is a well-known phenomenon. But it can be interesting to visualise how different commodities often trade in unison.
This chart tracks the percentage share of different commodities that were posting a positive monthly return at a given moment over the past four and a half years. Purple represents agricultural commodities, metals are in blue, and energy is in green.
The crash during the outbreak of the pandemic, famous for its negatively priced oil, is clearly visible. Most commodities snapped back after that initial shock.
The unified swoon in mid-2022 is also interesting. The market was unwinding the price shock that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine; meanwhile, concerns about rate increases were beginning to weigh on perceptions of US demand. China’s still locked-down economy remained sluggish.
Changing perceptions in the Fed funds futures market
In the wake of the Federal Reserve lifting its key interest rate to a 22-year high this week – and another GDP print that was stronger than expected – this visualisation shows how the elusive “pivot” to rate cuts has been pushed further out, at least as far as futures markets are concerned. (Remember that in May, the market expected a lengthy “pause” through 2023.)
The columns represent five upcoming Fed meetings. The large blue bar indicates the probabilities that are seen today. For the September meeting, futures estimate that there’s a roughly 75 percent chance of the key rate staying in its current range of 5.25 to 5.5 percent; there’s a 25 percent chance of a hike one step up.
The smaller bars represent the market’s perceptions two weeks and a month ago. Interestingly, the market seems to have become more convinced of a Fed “pause” this fall, rather than one or even two more rate hikes.
The market is pricing a very small chance of a pivot in December and somewhat larger probability for cuts in January or March.
Disinflation isn’t a thing in Argentina
Disinflation is spreading around the world, but there are a few exceptions. One is Argentina, Latin America’s third-biggest economy and a nation with grim experience of historic episodes of hyperinflation.
Earlier in 2023, year-on-year inflation soared past 100 percent for the first time in 30 years. In June, the annualised inflation print reached 115 percent.
This chart visualises the change in consumer prices as a steady progression over the course of various calendar years. Last year was an record outlier in recent history, and this year is even worse.
Bitcoin crash cycles
Now that cryptocurrencies have been around for more than a decade, grizzled veterans of the space can say they’ve experienced four different crashes: 2011, 2013, 2017 and 2021.
This chart tracks Bitcoin and compares the lengths, in days, of these four episodes’ drawdowns and recoveries.
The 2011 crash (in blue) was unlike the others: it was the deepest, and also had the quickest recovery to its pre-crash level – 625 days.
The current, post-2021 cycle (in orange) also just hit 625 days. A repeat of the post-2013 and 2017 cycles would see Bitcoin take two more years to climb back to its previous peak.
China’s youth unemployment
Youth unemployment in China has stayed well above pre-pandemic norms following the dismantling of zero-Covid restrictions, even as overall urban unemployment is improving.
Joblessness among 16-to-24-year-olds reached 21.3 percent in June, nearly double that cohort’s level in June 2019.
The seasonality in the chart is notable, showing the effects of new graduates entering the workforce in the summer.