Back to all blogs
Blogs
January 29, 2025

Japan’s Inflation Beats the US while Households Feel It’s 17% – Why Is the BOJ so Cautious?

Last summer, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) raised rates to 0.25% after moving away from negative rates, causing market volatility as the “yen carry trade” unwound. Sentiment shifted to concern over when hikes might stop. On January 24, the BOJ raised rates again to 0.5%, the highest in 17 years, but this was seen as a “dovish hike,” with expectations for slow future increases. In December, Japan’s inflation hit 3.6%, surpassing the US, while households perceive it at 17%. The BOJ faces challenges from sluggish wage growth and uncertainties in global trade and US policy, leaving its future moves unclear.
Share on LinkedIn
Share on X
In-house blogger
Guest blogger
Tetsuo Harry Ishihara
,
Macro Strategist, Macrobond consultant, and former adviser to Japanese regulators
All opinions expressed in this content are those of the contributor(s) and do not reflect the views of Macrobond Financial AB.
All written and electronic communication from Macrobond Financial AB is for information or marketing purposes and does not qualify as substantive research.
Editor:

Justification for the January Hike

The BOJ’s January 24 hike, increasing the upper end of its target range from 0.25% to 0.5%, followed hints from Deputy Governor Himino and Governor Ueda the previous week. While some market participants had anticipated a hike in December, the BOJ opted to wait for stronger evidence of wage growth, making March a possible alternative timeline.

The simultaneously released Quarterly Outlook report supported the hike, with policy board members projecting higher core inflation. Core inflation (excluding fresh food) remains above the BOJ’s 2% target, driven by steady service inflation, wage growth, and a weak yen.

Household Sentiment vs. Business Sentiment

Similar to the Federal Reserve, BOJ officials often address households directly, acknowledging the challenges of high inflation. Food prices have been a major factor. For example, Japan’s food CPI (including fresh food) has risen 23% over the past five years, as reflected in this rebased index.

While household sentiment remains low due to food-led inflation, business sentiment is thriving as the next graph shows. Corporate profits are near record highs, with the services sector maintaining its strongest sentiment levels since the 1990s. This divergence highlights the uneven impact of inflation across different segments of the economy.

Households Feel 17% Inflation

According to the latest BOJ Opinion Survey, households perceive prices to be 17% higher than a year ago - a stark contrast to the official headline inflation rate of 3.6%. This disconnect is a growing concern for both policymakers and politicians, as inflation remains the top issue for households.

Reasons to Hike Quickly – and Reasons Not To

Several factors support the case for more rapid rate hikes:

1. A persistently weak yen.

2. An upcoming key parliamentary election in July.

However, there are also strong reasons for the BOJ to proceed cautiously:

1. Avoiding another post-hike market rout by improving communication.

2. Rather sluggish real wage growth as the next graph implies.

3. Uncertainty surrounding global trade, US inflation, and currency policy—coined the “Trump effect.”

Back in December, unnamed BOJ officials told Nikkei News that hikes can be expected roughly every six months, leading some economists to predict the next hike may be delayed until September rather than July to avoid the election[i].

Is Inflation in Japan Really Higher Than in the US?

Japan’s headline inflation reached 3.6% year-on-year in December, surpassing the US rate of 2.9% after months of being nearly identical. The 0.7% acceleration in Japan’s inflation from November’s 2.9% was attributed to fading government energy subsidies[ii] and a record 65% year-on-year rise in rice prices. However, the implication that the acceleration is transitory seems debatable[iii].

Western-Style Core CPI Tells a Different Story

Some economists prefer using “Western-style” or “US-style” Core CPI - which excludes all food (except alcohol) and energy – as a measure of underlying inflation. By this measure, inflation in Japan has slowed to below 2%, contrasting with the BOJ’s targeted Core CPI (which excludes only fresh food) that remains stubbornly above 2%.

In the US, Core CPI and Core PCE are popular measures of underlying inflation. In other words, hypothetically speaking, if Fed officials had attended the latest BOJ meeting, they might have argued against a rate hike. Although more analysis is needed, this divergence highlights the complexity of inflation dynamics in Japan.

Conclusion: Future policy probably hinges on the US

During the press conference, there were multiple questions about the “neutral rate”, which is sometimes assumed to be about 1%, implying 2 more hikes. However, Governor Ueda gave few hints about the neutral rate and when or if future hikes are coming.

Future policy probably hinges on the US. For example, while expected Trump tariffs are mostly seen as inflationary, one risk is that they slow consumption or hurt global stocks. The Trump administration may also try to weaken the dollar as part of its trade policy – strengthening the yen. Another risk may be a slow response by the Fed to tame inflation, leading long term US yields to rise, weakening the yen. The first risk calls for caution around future hikes, while the second risk calls for action.

The BOJ finds itself in a delicate balancing act, navigating between inflation, sluggish real wage growth, and global uncertainties. Households claim they feel a staggering 17 percent inflation, on average. At the same time, strong business sentiment and record corporate profits suggest resilience in key sectors of the economy. 

Flexibility will be critical for the BOJ as they weigh the risks of moving too fast against the dangers of falling behind the curve.

[i] The BOJ’s 8 monetary policy meetings (MPM’s) are scheduled for January, March, April, June, July, September, October and December, with Outlook Reports – which often provide data justification for major changes - scheduled for January, April, July and October.

[ii] The subsidies are being brought back, which could cause February inflation prints to hook down.

[iii] For example, energy accounted for only 0.3 percentage points of the acceleration, while food contributed 0.4 percentage points. Notably, fresh vegetables - not rice - were the primary driver of food inflation. For the moment, it appears media reports that imply the acceleration was transitory seem slightly overdone.

Close
Previous
Next
Close
Cookie consent
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site.
To find out more, read our terms and conditions and cookie policy.
Accept
Heading
This is some text inside of a div block.
Click to enlarge
Premium data
This chart integrates premium data from our world-leading specialist data partners (When viewing the chart in Macrobond, premium data sources will only display for premium data subscribers)
Learn more
https://www.macrobond.com/solutions/data#premium-data
Revision History
This chart features Macrobond’s unique Revision History data which shows how key macroeconomic indicators have been revised over time
Learn more
https://help.macrobond.com/tutorials-training/3-analyzing-data/analysis-tree/using-the-series-list/vintage-data/
Change Region
This chart benefits from Macrobond's unique Change Region feature which allows the same analysis to be instantly applied to different regions. Click on learn more to see it in action!
Learn more
/insights/tips-and-tricks/change-region-function